Does the Central Bank want to control computers?

ILV is constantly pleased with the improvement of its work. The Central Bank works in close cooperation and also does not want to lag behind the desire to know and control more.



A couple of three years ago, having acquired a shock-water-resistant smartphone, I found an interesting chip in it. When connected to WiFi networks, after turning off and on, the MAC of the WiFi module changed. Then I considered it a drawback, and now after the news like:

The Central Bank will create a base of computers and smartphones to combat laundering. Suspicion can be caused by different companies that conduct operations from the same devices.

Also, if you familiarize yourself with court decisions where business fragmentation was recognized as fictitious in order to reduce taxes, when the organization found work with banking and tax structures to remove devices from one IP address (and this is sometimes possible if you use the Internet provided by the business area where the premises are rented) . Now what, expect the need to configure connections so that no one crosses the address or someone specifically confuse "digital" traces. IP6 might simplify the task, but it’s not a fact that in this case the regulatory authorities will not come up with any protection that taxpayers will have to implement for their money directly or through raising banking fees, additional digital signatures and tax deductions. Enterprise IT services will have to come up with internal controls in order to avoid uncomfortable requests from banks and tax authorities or immediately build connections through VPNs, TOR, etc. so that control would be minimal? And how good is it for ordinary citizens?