Something tells me that most of you live in cities. Do you know much about them?
Now itâs fashionable to talk about cities as living, evolving systems. The beginning of this phenomenon was the creation of the theory of self-organization of systems - synergetics - at the end of the 20th century. In its terms, the city is called an âopen dynamic dissipative systemâ, and you can build its model - âan object illustrating the dependence of form transformations on changing contentâ and describe âinternal structural transformations taking into account the possibility of indefinite system behavior over timeâ. All of the graphs, tables and algorithms in an unspoiled person cause a normal defensive reaction of numbness. But not everything is so hopeless.
Under the cut, there will be several bionic analogies that will allow you to take a side view of the city and understand how it lives, how it develops, moves, gets sick and dies. So let's not waste time and deal with the dismemberment.
In addition to mathematical, cognitive and formal models, there is also such a technique as analogy, which has been used by man for many thousands of years and has established itself well to simplify understanding. Of course, making forecasts based on analogies is bad, but you can track the dynamics of the process: in every self-respecting system there are energy sources, ways of its transmission, points of use, growth vectors, and so on. The first attempts to apply the concept of bionics to urban planning dates back to the 1930s, but they did not get much development then, since there is no complete analogy of the city in wildlife (if it were, it would be really strange). But certain aspects of the âphysiologyâ of the city have good correspondences. No matter how much I want to flatter the city, it basically behaves like a unicellular, lichen, colony of microorganisms or multicellular animal a little more complicated than a sponge.
Architects distinguish many structures and subsystems in the cityâs structure, each with its own name, many of which you may have encountered as a transport system or housing structure, but you probably havenât heard of others, for example, about a visual frame or mental map. However, each element has its own clear functional purpose.
The very first thing you come across when anatomizing any settlement is its frame of axes-bones and knots-joints. This is what gives shape and guides development from the first days. Each individual cell has a framework; without it, no processes can be properly organized, therefore it is logical that the megalopolis and the most seedy village itself have it. Firstly, these are the main roads oriented to neighboring settlements. The city will want to stretch along them and they will become the most stable, unchanged lines on the plan for centuries. Secondly, the skeleton includes obstacles: rivers, lakes, swamps, ravines and other geographical inconveniences that stop growth, squeezing the growing settlement, like an outer shell. On the other hand, it was precisely such elements that often served as a defense for the citadels of medieval cities, and the governing bodies gravitated towards them, so that some forms of relief can be called with good conscience the bones of the skull that hide the brain.
If a set of these parameters has already been set, you can predict the shape of the settlement in the future and how the network of smaller roads will develop, on which the meat and entrails will grow. And if in the old cities everything worked by itself, then in Soviet times, when compiling master plans for new cities, the authors of the projects had to move their brains, combining (not always successfully) the natural tendencies and dictates of the party leadership.
What can be learned from this:
The meat is muscle and fat, and in the cells of the cytoplasm it is such a thing that surrounds the bones, forming the bulk of the body of a living creature, accumulates and gives up resources, provides movement and determines overall vitality. For the city, this of course is what architects call âurban fabricâ, âfillingâ and other boring words: ordinary neighborhoods, mostly residential.
As any creature builds up mass at every opportunity, the city, with improved supplies, begins to attract more people and build new sleeping areas, even if it cannot always provide these âinternal migrantsâ with a normal standard of living and work. Low-rise areas are pleasant, but ineffective - this is fat, weakly penetrated by blood vessels and containing cells that are of little use to the body.
What can be learned from this:
This city is developing in a spiral. It is immediately clear that it arose naturally, and was not built from scratch.
Each process requires resources. For the city, these are people, goods, water, energy, information and time. The circulatory system redistributes resources between organs. The transport system of the city is engaged in people and goods, and engineering networks are in charge of energy and information. Transporting energy over long distances is not always profitable, so raw materials can be transported for its production, as glucose is delivered to mitochondria.
Engineering networks of all kinds are usually grouped with traffic arteries for several reasons: firstly, they are brought to new areas at the same time and it is unprofitable to conduct work in two places; secondly, as already mentioned, this is an island of stability, âburied and forgotâ, and tomorrow a skyscraper will not grow here; thirdly, there is an opportunity to save on the âvessel shellâ by building common protective and engineering structures-collectors; fourthly, it is important to save space on the indentation, because there are zones and elements that can be adjacent, while others are harmful to each other.
What can be learned from this:
The nervous system consists of nodes that process data and send signals and signal transmission paths. Since our information went according to the column âresourcesâ, it means that this is not about the Internet. This is about management. And I have sad news for you: cities are very primitive organisms, and they are managed very poorly. Master plans are not executed, the real situation does not correspond to the administrationâs data, control signals often do not reach or work in a bizarre manner, the reaction to any changes is always late.
But completely without control itâs also bad to live in changing conditions, therefore the city is usually divided into areas subject to local âgangliaâ, which have a chance to have time to correct something and prevent the situation from reaching a dead end (the sacral âbackâ brain of large dinosaurs confirms it works). Moreover, if the administrative division was performed without taking into account the specifics of the skeleton, muscle tissue and the circulatory system, the body will act and develop in a non-optimal way. Life example: the city divides the river into northern and southern halves, and administrative districts into eastern and western parts. As a result, we have a division into quarters and the constant need for coordination between the two administrations.
By the way, now the Russian Federation is going through a difficult period of changing the system of hard-drawn âgeneral plansâ, which basically worked poorly, to a system of flexible strategies - âmaster plansâ, with which so far few people even understand what to do. Therefore, my crystal ball predicts: do not even expect stable and logical urban development in the coming years.
What can be learned from this:
This city is well divided in half. The main thing is not to confuse how.
What happens to resources flowing into the city? They are either processed beyond recognition or finely divided and distributed throughout the body using the circulatory system. As fatty acids in the liver turn into acetoacetic acid, the bulk of which is used outside the liver, in various tissues and organs, so food and goods from storage areas are transported throughout the city. In industrial complexes, various transformations take place, but the same thing happens invariably with the results: they are used to maintain the vitality of the body. Not all residents directly go to it, there are both construction and transport sectors aimed at growth (they can be compared with protein metabolism, and everyday goods - with carbohydrate).
What can be learned from this:
Without a sewage system, there is no civilization; everyone knows this. In the body, two organs filter the blood from harmful substances: the liver and kidneys (the number of kidneys in organisms is different, so we wonât go deeper). The kidneys remove what they can in an unchanged form, and the liver converts waste (sometimes into more dangerous metabolites). The intestine carries out simply unused resources, in our analogy it is the removal of solid waste to landfills. The sewer system acts as a kidney (unless you have methane tanks that convert waste into energy). Garbage processing, waste incineration plants and methane tanks perform the function of the liver.
What can be learned from this:
In fact, this article is far from exhaustive and, moreover, does not claim to be scientifically accurate. Iâll talk about the growth of cities, their movement, diseases, digestion of space and other âphysiological processesâ some other time, so as not to bring everything together. If you have something to supplement or questions have arisen - I am waiting for your comments. Thank you for reading, I hope it was not boring.